Colombia - Finca El Porvenir — Omni/Espresso
Washed
Cherrybook Index
65Noted
Evidence-of-quality score, not a cup score. Sparse signal: 2 of 7 signals on file. Methodology
Price position
US$2.85/ozSEK 242.00 for 250g
this lot $2.85$1.63$2.62
Typical band for this profile $1.63 to $2.62 (washed single-origin lots (other named varieties, retail bags); SEK listings in stock). Where it sits
Catalog summary
A washed lot from Huila, Colombia, indexed 65 on sparse evidence and priced above the typical band for its listed profile.
Based on the listing and catalog evidence
Price and availability set by the roaster.
Cherrybook last checked this listing today.
Roaster’s notes
dark chocolate · caramel · berries
- Fruit
- Cocoa and nut
- Sugar and spice
Open the flavor wheel
Mapped from the roaster’s tasting notes to the SCA flavor wheel; Cherrybook’s interpretation of the stated notes, not the roaster’s own categorization.
- Origin
- Huila, CO
- Producer
- Sandra Milena Mora & Hector Coy
- Farm / Co-op
- Finca El Porvenir
- Process
- Washed
- Altitude
- 1750–1850 m
- Varietals
- Caturra
- Harvest
- —
- Weight
- 250g
- Bag price
- SEK 242.00
- Price / oz
- US$2.85/oz
- Brew
- omni, espresso
from the roaster’s storeread by Cherrybook from the listing“estimated” below = inferred, not stated
Price contextmodeled
A modeled range and current prices for comparable listings.
$2.85/oz
typically $1.63 to $2.62
Where it sits
22 washed single-origin lots (other named varieties, retail bags); SEK listings in stock
typical band this lot
86th percentile of 22 washed single-origin lots (other named varieties, retail bags); SEK listings in stock right now.
What moves this price
cheaper×1.00pricier
- Colombia origin×1.05
- Washed process×0.96
- Roaster brand and sourcing×0.97
At 250 g, this bag runs about 2% more per ounce than a typical 306 g bag; that is pack size, not the coffee.
How this estimate works
A statistical model, refit weekly across the in-stock catalog, estimates what a coffee with these listed attributes typically sells for per ounce. Each multiplier compares one trait against the average lot in this market; the roaster line covers brand and sourcing together, which this model cannot separate. Bag size is shown separately, priced at the rate observed across sizes of the same coffee, because it says nothing about the coffee itself. The distribution counts every in-stock listing in the comparison group, with at least 15 listings from three roasters and no roaster supplying more than 60% of it. Decaf, blends, variety segments, processing families and bag formats stay separate. Origin, roast and selling currency can broaden as the group label indicates. Prices are converted to USD per ounce; shipping and differences in tax treatment are not adjusted. The model reads listed attributes only: the quality of the specific lot in the bag is not observable, so a price above the typical band is not evidence of overpricing.
Not listed by the roaster: roast level
Cherrybook Index (CBI)
Evidence-of-quality score, not a cup score. Methodology
65
Noted
Sparse signal
Confidence2 of 7 signals on file
Score is heavily shrunk toward 50; treat as a placeholder until more sources arrive.
How confidence affects the score
Coverage measures signal availability, not cup quality. This coffee has 23% of the signal universe on file. Missing sources are dropped, remaining weights are renormalized, and the result is shrunk toward a neutral 50 baseline by 43% so one thin signal cannot carry the score on its own.
The math on file: renormalized base 76.9 shrunk to 65.5 = 65.
Missing: SCA grade, Coffee Review, YouTube reviews, On-shop ratings, Cherrybook ratings
- 80/ 22% weightRoaster transparencyProducer / farm / lot disclosure depth
- 76/ 78% weightReddit sentimentSentiment across specialty-coffee discussion
Comps & alternatives
Tasting flight
Compare this with three more lots selected from the catalog.
Brew a set side-by-side. The picks vary along axes that pair with this lot; origin, process, roast, or producer; so you learn the difference, not just drink four good cups.
Reference · About the varietal & origin
About Koppi Roasters
Community reputation · Reddit
Well-regarded· sentiment 76/100
Three Reddit contributions give Koppi Roasters a mixed but favorable picture. One brewer struggled to get good flavor from two Ethiopian coffees. Another detailed a Finca El Paraiso they considered among their best recent coffees, and a third described a Burundi coffee as awesome despite some under-extraction.
Ethiopian brew difficultyFinca El ParaisoBurundi coffee
Threads cited (3)
- r/Coffee · 10↑ · [Question][Gear] Feldgrind owner that needs some advice
...hat switching to a decent grinder would improve my coffee but until now i've been a bit disappointed. At the moment i have 2 ethiopian coffees from koppi (nano challa & biftu gudina) and i really struggle to get a decent flavor out of it with the aeropress. What grind settings do other feldgrind users use for aeropr
- r/Coffee · 4↑ · [Review] Finca El Paraiso - Koppi Coffee Roasters
...y own review. I also got bags from Finca Tamana and Finca Wisaquillo, but right now this one has taken up all my interest. ________ [**Finca El Paraiso - Koppi Coffee Roasters - Helsingborg, Sweden**](http://koppi.bigcartel.com/product/el-paraiso) ________ **Region**: [Huila, Colombia](http://imgur.com/n1Ew34Q) **Pr
- r/Coffee · 3↑ · [Technique] Grinding adjustment for beans a couple/three weeks past roast (Chemex)?
So I've been brewing some awesome beans (Burundi is the origin and roaster is Koppi in Sweden). I'm getting a bit of under-extraction I think, but I'm not great at detecting under/over extraction. The beans were roasted on 16th December. I know that is not as fresh as I prefer, but my favourite third wave shop had them
On YouTube
1 video · 1k combined views
1 video covers Koppi Roasters from reviewer nieteraz.
Coverage from others