Colombia Paola Trujillo
Experimental
Cherrybook Index
67Noted
Evidence-of-quality score, not a cup score. Sparse signal: 2 of 7 signals on file. Methodology
Price position
$2.57/oz$33.50 for 369g
this lot $2.57$1.98$3.20
Typical band for this profile $1.98 to $3.20. Where it sits
Catalog summary
An experimental lot from Cauca, Colombia, indexed 67 on sparse evidence and priced inside the typical band for its listed profile.
Based on the listing and catalog evidence
Price and availability set by the roaster.
Cherrybook last checked this listing today.
Roaster’s notes
bergamot · rose tea · wildflower honey
- Citrus
- Floral
- Sugar and spice
Open the flavor wheel
Mapped from the roaster’s tasting notes to the SCA flavor wheel; Cherrybook’s interpretation of the stated notes, not the roaster’s own categorization.
- Origin
- Cauca, CO
- Producer
- Paola Trujillo
- Farm / Co-op
- Patio Bonita
- Process
- Experimental
- Altitude
- 1570–1650 m
- Varietals
- Pink bourbon
- Harvest
- —
- Weight
- 369g
- Bag price
- $33.50
- Price / oz
- $2.57/oz
- Brew
- —
from the roaster’s storeread by Cherrybook from the listing“estimated” below = inferred, not stated
Price contextmodeled
A modeled range and current prices for comparable listings.
$2.57/oz
typically $1.98 to $3.20
Where it sits
typical band this lot
What moves this price
cheaper×1.00pricier
- Experimental process×1.24
- Roaster brand and sourcing×0.85
- Rare variety×1.12
- Colombia origin×1.05
At 369 g, this bag runs about 2% less per ounce than a typical 306 g bag; that is pack size, not the coffee.
How this estimate works
A statistical model, refit weekly across the in-stock catalog, estimates what a coffee with these listed attributes typically sells for per ounce. Each multiplier compares one trait against the average lot in this market; the roaster line covers brand and sourcing together, which this model cannot separate. Bag size is shown separately, priced at the rate observed across sizes of the same coffee, because it says nothing about the coffee itself. The distribution counts every in-stock listing in the comparison group, with at least 15 listings from three roasters and no roaster supplying more than 60% of it. Decaf, blends, variety segments, processing families and bag formats stay separate. Origin, roast and selling currency can broaden as the group label indicates. Prices are converted to USD per ounce; shipping and differences in tax treatment are not adjusted. The model reads listed attributes only: the quality of the specific lot in the bag is not observable, so a price above the typical band is not evidence of overpricing.
Not listed by the roaster: roast level
Cherrybook Index (CBI)
Evidence-of-quality score, not a cup score. Methodology
67
Noted
Sparse signal
Confidence2 of 7 signals on file
Score is heavily shrunk toward 50; treat as a placeholder until more sources arrive.
How confidence affects the score
Coverage measures signal availability, not cup quality. This coffee has 23% of the signal universe on file. Missing sources are dropped, remaining weights are renormalized, and the result is shrunk toward a neutral 50 baseline by 43% so one thin signal cannot carry the score on its own.
The math on file: renormalized base 87.8 shrunk to 71.8 + bonuses = 67.
Missing: SCA grade, Coffee Review, YouTube reviews, On-shop ratings, Cherrybook ratings
- 90/ 78% weightReddit sentimentSentiment across specialty-coffee discussion
- 80/ 22% weightRoaster transparencyProducer / farm / lot disclosure depth
Bonuses applied
- +-5Stale-stock demotionThis lot has been listed in stock for an extended time; specialty coffee freshness degrades over weeks
Sensory profileestimated
- Acidity
- 4
- Body
- 3
- Sweetness
- 4
- Balance
- 4
- Clean
- 4
Comps & alternatives
Tasting flight
Compare this with three more lots selected from the catalog.
Brew a set side-by-side. The picks vary along axes that pair with this lot; origin, process, roast, or producer; so you learn the difference, not just drink four good cups.
Reference · About the varietal & origin
About Sump Coffee
Community reputation · Reddit
Cult favorite· sentiment 90/100
Two Reddit posts praise Sump. One poster says they enjoyed trying it; another calls a Costa Rica coffee exceptional, juicy, full, easy to brew, and highly recommends it.
Costa Rica coffeeSt. Louis roaster
Threads cited (2)
- r/Coffee · 24↑ · Finally got to try Sump from St. Louis. Enjoyed it but I used a little too much water. Any
Finally got to try Sump from St. Louis. Enjoyed it but I used a little too much water. Any thoughts on Sump, their coffee, or ways to prepare it?
- r/Coffee · 5↑ · [STL] Coffee Recommendation: Sumps's Costa Rica Las Lajas
For all you STL peeps, Sump's most recent batch of Costa Rica is exceptional. Very juicy, very full. Very easy to brew at home on a V60, too. I'm doing 25:350 at a 14 grind (on a Baratza), 50g bloom, water in by 1:45 and dripped by 2:20. If you can pick up a bag or find a cup in a local shop, I highly recommend trying.
On YouTube
8 videos · 284k combined views
Sump Coffee has 6 videos on their channel; 2 videos come from outside reviewers (Hypegirl Creative, STL Curator).
From Sump Coffee